Animal Scales Seminar Series

Hosted by UCL Anthropocene and the Centre for Critical Global Change, Goldsmiths
From Aristotle’s scala naturae, to the vast scales of animal agriculture, to moral scales, determined by cognitive scales: animal lives have and continue to be shaped by different kinds of scales and their positions on them. Scales enact, authorise, and justify possible relations with animals, including deathly scales of comparison. But scales are neither fixed nor unchanging, and in the context of increasingly complex, multi-dimensional and multi-temporal analyses of environmental catastrophe, numerous, often novel, scales are proliferating. How do animal scales come into existence? Are animals themselves ‘scale-makers’ and, if so, can they disrupt the pre-scaled objects of knowledge that support the division of academic labour? If animals operate at scale (collective migration, collective thinking), how do they also resist it? This seminar series asks after the disciplinary, theoretical, methodological, empirical, political, ethical, and legal implications of thinking animals in and through scale.

Click on the picture to start watching the seminar series.
The Animal Scale series is organised by Mariam Motamedi Frazer and colleagues at Goldsmiths. Mariam Motamedi-Fraser is a Reader in Sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London. She teaches and researches in the field of Animal studies. Her most recent book Dog Politics: Species Stories in the Animal Sciences (2024, Manchester University Press) is a critique of the dog-human ‘bond’ and of ‘species stories’ in the animal sciences more broadly. You can download Dog Politics for free, here.

Learning points

  • How does thinking about scales help us consider the changing aspects human-animal relations/health in the Anthropocene?
  • How do the different scales that constitute animals lives(and deaths) reflect the way that inequalities are enacted and sustained in the context of environmental change and crisis?
  • What theoretical, methodological, empirical and/or political obstacles exist to thinking about animals at the scale of ‘the individual’?